M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-03227
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gulfside Supply, Inc.source ↗ filed by Berman Law Firm, PA · No. 8:26-cv-03227 · 28:451 Employment Discrimination · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparable pixel/tracking privacy rulings split: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived on factual/duty theories, while Tower Health's Meta Pixel claim and Nuance's BIPA claims were dismissed. Outcomes turn heavily on statutory exemptions and pleading specificity, which is unclear for Gulfside's facts. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $115M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Apple $250M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Santoro v. Tower Health — dismissal of Meta Pixel-based privacy claim shows courts often reject tracking-tech wiretap theories absent clear unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data. Main risk: Dismissal on exemption/duty grounds similar to Tower Health and Nuance, where tracking/consent theories failed as a matter of law. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $65K–$725K Small, uncertain class-size estimate and thin per-member sample (n=2) limit precision; defendant-specific litigation history is absent. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-10-23 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |