E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-08137
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAIN LINE HEALTH, INCsource ↗ filed by KOLLER LAW PC · Judge Gerald John Pappert · No. 2:26-cv-08137 · 28:451 Employment Discrimination · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾3rd Circuit's Santoro v. Tower Health affirmed dismissal of nearly identical Meta Pixel health-data claims, directly controlling in E.D. Pa. However, Doe v. Bayhealth allowed a breach-of-confidentiality theory to survive, showing some paths remain viable. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $115M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Apple $250M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Santoro v. Tower Health (3rd Cir.) — same circuit, same pixel-tracking theory, dismissed with prejudice; strongly persuasive here. Main risk: 3rd Circuit precedent (Tower Health) directly disfavors pixel-tracking health privacy claims in this jurisdiction. This defendant: Prior Torregrossa v. Main Line Healthcare filing suggests repeat exposure to privacy/wiretap claims over tracking tech. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1.05M–$9.80M Small sample size, especially per-member anchor (n=2); class size is estimated from general web signals, not confirmed patient counts. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-10-23 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |