M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-03224
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.source ↗ filed by BT Law Group, PLLC · No. 8:26-cv-03224 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Health-data tracking claims show split outcomes: Doe v. Bayhealth survived on breach-of-confidentiality theory, while Santoro v. Tower Health's Meta Pixel health-sharing claims were dismissed with prejudice. Integris shows federal officer removal fails but state privacy claims remain unresolved, suggesting fact-intensive survival analysis. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $115M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Apple $250M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. - most analogous as healthcare-adjacent defendant sharing health info via tracking tech; survived MTD on confidentiality duty theory. Main risk: Tower Health-style dismissal: courts increasingly reject pixel/tracking-based health-data sharing claims as lacking actionable interception under wiretap statutes. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1M–$65M Small, heterogeneous comparable set mixing BIPA, CIPA, and health-privacy theories; J&J's specific wiretap conduct and actual class size are unconfirmed, so figures are rough bounding estimates. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-10-23 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |