D.S.C. · No. 2:26-cv-05037
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boeing Company, Thesource ↗ filed by Wukela Law Firm · Judge Richard Mark Gergel · No. 2:26-cv-05037 · 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race) · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy/wiretap rulings split roughly evenly: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived on confidentiality/BIPA theories, while Santoro, Walker, and Cisneros were dismissed on similar data-sharing or consent claims. No direct Boeing precedent exists, so outcome likely turns on specific statutory pleading and consent facts. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $115M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Apple $250M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — shows confidentiality/privacy claims against institutional defendants can survive MTD when a duty-based relationship is pled. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead concrete harm or lack of interception/consent facts, as in Cisneros and Santoro. This defendant: Prior Boeing class certification was reversed in a false advertising case, suggesting courts scrutinize Boeing class claims closely. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $145K–$1.50M Small, non-direct comparable set; Boeing-specific facts, class definition, and claim mechanism (wiretap vs. biometric) unknown, limiting precision. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D.S.C. | 2026-10-22 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |