N.D. Tex. · No. 3:26-cv-03699
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JM Bullion, Inc.source ↗ filed by Law Offices of Lippe & Associates · Judge Matthew Joseph Kacsmaryk · No. 3:26-cv-03699 · 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy-tech rulings split: Tower Health's Meta Pixel claim was dismissed while Bayhealth's confidentiality claim and Gunnar Optiks' BIPA claim survived, showing outcome hinges on specific statute and tracking mechanism pled. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $115M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Apple $250M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Santoro v. Tower Health (3rd Cir.) — dismissal of pixel-tracking privacy claim shows courts often reject these absent concrete disclosure harm. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to show unauthorized interception/disclosure beyond ordinary website analytics, as in Tower Health. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1.50M–$29M Small, heterogeneous comparable set mixes BIPA, wiretap, and confidentiality claims; true class size and statute invoked are unconfirmed. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | N.D. Tex. | 2026-10-22 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |