C.D. Cal. · No. 8:26-cv-03089
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Svetness, Corp.source ↗ filed by Sconzo Law Office, P.A. · No. 8:26-cv-03089 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA Title III barrier suits often survive dismissal if specific barriers are pled, similar to Holmes v. Bax affirming ADA claims, but Lowell v. Lyft shows courts dismiss when plaintiff fails to prove modification feasibility. Small single-location defendant limits exposure. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — shows ADA claims can fail if plaintiff doesn't carry burden on reasonableness/effectiveness of requested fix. Main risk: Dismissal or mootness if defendant remediates barrier quickly (cf. Burton v. Chase Point mootness dispute), cutting off injunctive relief and fee claim. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $3K–$12K Single small-defendant ADA case; no class, no prior record, and settlement comps are from much larger entities, limiting precision. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | C.D. Cal. | 2026-10-21 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |