← Records

C.G. v. Virginia Hospital Health System

E.D. Va. · No. 1:26-cv-03522

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
Virginia Hospital Health Systemsource ↗
filed by Milberg, PLLC · No. 1:26-cv-03522 · 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾
Healthcare tracking-tech privacy claims split: Doe v. Bayhealth allowed breach-of-confidentiality to survive, while Tower Health's Meta Pixel claims were dismissed with prejudice and Integris Health left state-law privacy claims unresolved. Outcome likely hinges on specific statutory theory (wiretap/ECPA vs. common-law confidentiality) pled.
Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $115M · n=10
Meta $725M · Google $425M · Apple $250M
Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2)
Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M
Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — healthcare provider's duty of confidentiality for tracking-tech disclosures survived MTD, most analogous to VHHS facts
Main risk: Dismissal on pleading/causation grounds as in Tower Health, where Meta Pixel health-data-sharing claims failed with prejudice
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1.50M–$17.50M
Small, heterogeneous comparable set; no prior VHHS litigation history; class size and per-member figures are rough estimates pending discovery of actual patient data scope. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts
FilingPrivacy & WiretapE.D. Va.2026-10-21$59.50M–$725M
comparable settlements