M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-03198
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarity Services, Inc.source ↗ filed by Ethan B. Babb PLLC · No. 8:26-cv-03198 · 28:1441 Notice of Removal · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M ▾Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital shows courts readily dismiss FCRA furnisher claims lacking a private right of action, while Askins v. CRST shows bare statutory disclosure violations can survive as concrete injury. Clarity Services faces similar furnisher/CRA exposure, so outcome likely splits claim-by-claim. Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M median $7.86M · n=10 Equifax $100M · Equifax Informatio $30M · Equifax $30M Per member (realized): ~$250 median · $25–$500 (n=5) Comparable verdict: TransUnion $60M · TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. Dlj Mortgage Capital, Inc. — directly parallels FCRA furnisher theory; some counts dismissed for no private right of action, others survive on adequate pleading. Main risk: Dismissal of core FCRA counts for lack of private right of action or insufficient concrete-injury pleading, as in Minano. This defendant: Six prior filings against Clarity Services suggest it is a recurring FCRA/FDCPA litigation target, implying possible systemic reporting-accuracy issues. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $450K–$45M Web signals conflate unrelated 'Clarity' entities (Microsoft Clarity, Clarity Software), undermining class-size confidence; small ruling sample limits precedential weight. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | M.D. Fla. | 2026-10-21 | $2.40M–$100M comparable settlements |