D. Del. · No. 1:26-cv-01360
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ParkingMD, Inc.source ↗ filed by deLeeuw Law LLC · Judge Unassigned Judge · No. 1:26-cv-01360 · 18:2511 Wiretapping · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Doe v. Bayhealth survived a near-identical healthcare-confidentiality/tracking-tech claim in Delaware state court, while Santoro v. Tower Health and Cisneros v. Nuance show courts readily dismiss health-privacy pixel/biometric claims absent clear statutory fit. ParkingMD's handicap-permit health data processing sits ambiguously between these outcomes. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $115M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Apple $250M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr.: Delaware court allowed breach-of-confidentiality claim for healthcare-adjacent entity using tracking tech, directly relevant venue and fact pattern. Main risk: Dismissal on grounds ParkingMD isn't a true healthcare provider or lacks statutory duty, as in Santoro and Cisneros exemption rulings. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $80K–$5.25M Tiny comparable sample, no prior ParkingMD litigation history, and class size is a rough inference from sparse web signals. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D. Del. | 2026-10-20 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |