D. Or. · No. 6:26-cv-02302
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. Charles Health System, Inc.source ↗ filed by McNaul Ebel PLLC · Judge Amy E. Potter · No. 6:26-cv-02302 · 05:552 Right to Privacy Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA Title III claims often survive early motions (Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations) but courts dismiss when plaintiff fails to show a plausible, effective barrier remedy (Lowell v. Lyft). Small single-location defendants like this typically face narrow injunctive-relief exposure, not damages class claims. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — shows courts require concrete proof that requested modification is reasonable/effective, a key pleading risk here. Main risk: Single-location ADA Title III suits are frequently dismissed or settled cheaply if barriers are remediated quickly, per Lowell's reasonableness-of-modification bar. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $3K–$13K Small sample, mismatched comparables (mostly larger defendants/different ADA contexts); true class size is likely 1 plaintiff, not a class, limiting EV precision. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D. Or. | 2026-10-20 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |