D. Mass. · No. 1:26-cv-14752
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eversource Energy Service Companysource ↗ filed by Milberg, PLLC · Judge Richard Gaylore Stearns · No. 1:26-cv-14752 · 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy/wiretap suits split sharply: Doe v. Bayhealth and Clements v. Gunnar Optiks survived early motions, while Tower Health (Meta Pixel) and Cisneros v. Nuance were dismissed on exemption/standing grounds. Eversource's case likely turns on whether tracking-technology or data-sharing claims meet interception/consent thresholds similar to these health-data and biometric precedents. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $115M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Apple $250M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — survived because provider owed a confidentiality duty; Eversource's utility-customer relationship may face analogous but weaker duty arguments. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead contemporaneous interception or lack of individualized harm, as in Tower Health and Cisneros v. Nuance. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $25M–$95M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; no prior Eversource litigation data; true class size and theory specifics (wiretap vs. tracking pixel) unconfirmed. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D. Mass. | 2026-10-20 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |