D. Mass. · No. 1:26-cv-14751
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47Brand, LLCsource ↗ filed by Levi & Korsinsky LLP · Judge Denise Jefferson Casper · No. 1:26-cv-14751 · 18:2511 Wiretapping · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy/tracking rulings split roughly evenly: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived on confidentiality/BIPA theories, while Tower Health, Nuance, and Walker were dismissed on exemption or pleading grounds. Wiretap claims against retailers depend heavily on jurisdiction-specific consent and recording definitions. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $115M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Apple $250M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — shows tracking-technology disclosure claims can survive MTD when a duty/confidentiality theory is well-pled, relevant to D.Mass privacy claims. Main risk: Dismissal via statutory exemption or failure to plead actionable interception, as in Nuance (BIPA exemption) and Tower Health (pixel claim dismissed) Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $500K–$21.75M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; per-member benchmark based on only 2 data points; class size is inferred, not confirmed by filings. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D. Mass. | 2026-10-20 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |