E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-08024
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTOLENDERS LIQUIDATION CENTER INC.source ↗ filed by PHILADELPHIA, PA 19133 · Judge Nitza I. Quinones Alejandro · No. 2:26-cv-08024 · 15:1640 Truth in Lending · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Privacy/wiretap claims against website tracking tech show split outcomes: Bayhealth survived breach-of-confidentiality, Gunnar BIPA claims revived on appeal, but Santoro and Integris saw core privacy claims dismissed or unclear. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $115M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Apple $250M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confirms website-tracking privacy claims can survive MTD when duty/confidentiality plausibly pled, relevant if PA WESCA claim similarly framed. Main risk: Dismissal risk mirrors Santoro v. Tower Health, where Pixel/tracking-based privacy claims were dismissed for lack of cognizable harm. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $250K–$5M No defendant-specific litigation history; class size is estimated, not sourced from disclosed traffic data; small-n settlement anchor limits precision. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-10-20 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |