M.D.N.C. · No. 1:26-cv-01229
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN LANDMARK MANAGEMENT LLCsource ↗ filed by HALPERIN PETERSEN & MIKKILINENI LLP · No. 1:26-cv-01229 · 28:1332 Diversity · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Wiretap/tracking claims show split outcomes: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived early dismissal while Tower Health and Cisneros were dismissed on exemption/standing grounds. American Landmark's smaller scale and lack of tech-giant resources make big-settlement comparables weak anchors. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $115M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Apple $250M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confidentiality/tracking claim survived MTD, showing courts will let privacy-tech claims proceed past pleading stage. Main risk: Dismissal like Tower Health/Cisneros if claim framed as statutory exemption (e.g., ordinary business use) or lacks concrete injury under wiretap statute. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $11K–$1.12M Small, heterogeneous comparable set mixing tech giants and healthcare; no prior case history for this defendant; actual class size and claim theory unconfirmed. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D.N.C. | 2026-10-20 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |