M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-03149
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valenti Southeast Management LLCsource ↗ filed by Milberg, PLLC · No. 8:26-cv-03149 · 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Privacy/wiretap claims against site-tracking or call-recording defendants show split outcomes: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived dismissal while Santoro and Cisneros were dismissed on exemption/standing grounds. No case directly mirrors a regional property manager, so outcome hinges on specific tracking-tech facts pled. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confirms confidentiality/wiretap-style claims survive when a duty or statutory interception theory is well-pled, a plausible path here. Main risk: Dismissal on statutory exemption or lack of interception/consent-based defense, as in Cisneros (BIPA exemption) and Santoro (pixel claim dismissed with prejudice) Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $40K–$2.50M Small defendant with no prior litigation history; class size and theory specifics (e.g., call recording vs. web tracking) are inferred from limited web signals, not case filings. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-10-16 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |