E.D. Wis. · No. 2:26-cv-01916
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZFT Opco LLCsource ↗ filed by Nye Stirling Hale Miller & Sweet LLP · Judge Pamela Pepper · No. 2:26-cv-01916 · 42:2000 American Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$780K ▾ADA accessibility claims show split outcomes: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations and Price v. Diab upheld default judgment/injunctive relief for plaintiff. Comparable settlements $65K–$780K median $365K · n=4 The Container Stor $780K · Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — shows plaintiffs must concretely prove proposed accommodation is effective, a common pleading hurdle for ADA website/access claims. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead effective, specific remediation as in Lowell v. Lyft Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $50K–$400K ADA Title III suits typically yield injunctive relief/fees, not per-member damages; estimates are rough proxies from settlement comps, not a true EV model. · grounded in 8 rulings, 4 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | E.D. Wis. | 2026-10-15 | $65K–$780K comparable settlements |