M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-03132
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc.source ↗ filed by The Consumer Lawyers, PLLC · No. 8:26-cv-03132 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M ▾Comparable FCRA rulings split: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage dismissed furnisher claims lacking private right of action but let pleading-deficient counts proceed without prejudice, while Askins v. CRST held bare disclosure violations suffice for standing. Experian faces a pattern of similar individual FCRA filings (Harding, Fuller, Butler, Stanislaus, Logan, Kancharla), suggesting routine but survivable claims. Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M median $5.85M · n=10 Equifax $100M · Equifax Informatio $30M · Equifax $30M Per member (realized): ~$250 median · $25–$500 (n=5) Comparable verdict: TransUnion $60M · TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. — shows FCRA furnisher claims often dismissed for no private right of action or insufficient pleading, a direct risk for similar Experian claims. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to state a claim or lack of private right of action under specific FCRA subsections, as in Minano. This defendant: Experian faces repeated individual FCRA filings (6 in dataset), suggesting routine litigation exposure rather than systemic class risk. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$1K Single-plaintiff case; class-action settlement comparables likely inapplicable unless class certified, so EV reflects individual claim value only. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | M.D. Fla. | 2026-10-15 | $2.40M–$100M comparable settlements |