E.D.N.Y · No. 1:26-cv-06631
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPMorgan Chase & Co.source ↗ filed by Usher Law Group P.C. · No. 1:26-cv-06631 · 28:1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA Title III web-accessibility suits like this typically survive early motions when plaintiff alleges concrete barriers, mirroring Price v. Diab's recognition of injunctive relief plus fee-shifting even on default. Small retailers rarely litigate to judgment, favoring quick settlement over prolonged discovery. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — confirms ADA plaintiffs can secure injunctive relief and attorney's fees even via default, incentivizing filing against small defendants like OPPO. Main risk: No compensatory damages under ADA Title III; recovery depends on fee-shifting and injunctive compliance costs, capping monetary exposure. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$20K No direct settlement or verdict data for this defendant or theory; estimate relies on general ADA web-accessibility litigation patterns, not case-specific facts. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D.N.Y | 2026-10-15 | $2K–$20K rough EV |