S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-09049
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DriveWealth, LLCsource ↗ filed by AWK Survivor Advocate Attorneys · No. 1:26-cv-09049 · 28:1332 Diversity Action · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Tracking/disclosure-based privacy claims show split outcomes: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived pleading-stage scrutiny, while Tower Health's Meta Pixel claim and Integris's state privacy claims were dismissed or left unclear. DriveWealth's wiretap theory likely hinges on similar tracking-technology consent issues with no settled S.D.N.Y. precedent cited here. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr.: confidentiality claim via tracking tech survived MTD, showing plausible path for DriveWealth's analogous wiretap theory. Main risk: Dismissal on consent/exemption grounds, as in Tower Health (Meta Pixel claim dismissed) or Nuance (statutory exemption defeated BIPA claims) Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2M–$40M Small sample size, unclear exact class size/user base for B2B infrastructure provider, and no prior DriveWealth litigation history to calibrate risk. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-10-14 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |