← Records

Gaither v. Astrana Health, Inc

C.D. Cal. · No. 2:26-cv-11929

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
Astrana Health, Incsource ↗
filed by Emery Reddy PC · No. 2:26-cv-11929 · 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾
Healthcare privacy/tracking claims split: Bayhealth survived breach-of-confidentiality while Tower Health and Santoro (Meta Pixel) were dismissed; Integris shows removal and merits issues remain unsettled. Astrana's wiretap theory likely hinges on similar pixel/tracking facts, making outcome fact-dependent.
Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10
Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google $135M
Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2)
Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M
Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — survived MTD on confidentiality duty for healthcare provider disclosing data via tracking tech, closest factual analog.
Main risk: Dismissal pattern in Tower Health/Santoro (Meta Pixel) shows courts often reject these claims for lack of individualized harm or standing.
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $6M–$52.50M
Small comparable sample, no prior Astrana litigation history, and class size is inferred from general company profile, not confirmed patient counts. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts
FilingPrivacy & WiretapC.D. Cal.2026-10-13$59.50M–$725M
comparable settlements