E.D. Wis. · No. 2:26-cv-01885
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack's Surf & Sport LLCsource ↗ filed by Nye Stirling Hale Miller & Sweet LLP · Judge Pamela Pepper · No. 2:26-cv-01885 · 42:2000 American Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Price v. Diab confirms ADA plaintiffs can win default judgment plus fee-shifting, but Lowell v. Lyft shows dismissal where plaintiff fails to prove proposed modification is effective and reasonable. Outcome here hinges on specificity of alleged barriers and remediation feasibility. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — establishes prevailing-party fee entitlement even via default judgment, relevant since many Title III ADA suits resolve without trial. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective remedial modification, as in Lowell v. Lyft Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$175K Comparables are thematically mixed (ADA, ECOA, SNAP, FLSA) and not squarely Title III retail-access cases; defendant size/revenue unclear due to possible name conflation with larger 'Jack's Surfboards' chain. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | E.D. Wis. | 2026-10-09 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |