← Records

HARRIS v. APIS SERVICES, INC.

E.D. Pa. · No. 5:26-cv-07779

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
APIS SERVICES, INC.source ↗
filed by Lynch Carpenter LLP · Judge Jeffrey L. Schmehl · No. 5:26-cv-07779 · 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾
Privacy/wiretap claims split in comparables: Bayhealth's confidentiality claim survived while Tower Health's Meta Pixel claim was dismissed and Integris's third-party sharing claim remains unclear on remand. No mega-platform scale here, so trial/settlement comps (Google, Meta) are poor fits.
Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10
Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google $135M
Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2)
Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M
Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confidentiality claim for tracking-tech disclosure survived MTD, showing similar privacy theories can clear pleading stage.
Main risk: Dismissal on causation/standing grounds as in Tower Health (Meta Pixel claim dismissed with prejudice) if plaintiffs can't show concrete injury from data sharing.
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $100K–$900K
No prior litigation history for this defendant and unclear public class-size data; estimate highly speculative given small comparable sample and scale mismatch with cited settlements. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts
FilingPrivacy & WiretapE.D. Pa.2026-10-09$59.50M–$725M
comparable settlements