S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08932
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notes to Self, LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08932 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA accessibility outcomes split: Lowell v. Lyft shows failure-to-accommodate claims dismissed absent proof of effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax and Burton show such claims can survive or proceed to injunctive relief. Small e-commerce defendants like Notes to Self typically settle quickly rather than litigate website-accessibility claims. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) — governs SDNY ADA web/service accessibility claims; dismissal affirmed where plaintiff failed to show reasonable modification would be effective. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$38K No defendant-specific history, no direct comparable verdicts, and settlement data drawn from much larger defendants; estimate highly uncertain. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-10-09 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |