C.D. Cal. · No. 2:26-mc-00106
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TikTok Inc.source ↗ filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP · No. 2:26-mc-00106 · Civil Miscellaneous Case · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparables split roughly evenly: Bayhealth and Gunnar/Integris show privacy/tracking claims can survive dismissal, while Tower Health and Nuance show similar tech-tracking privacy theories dismissed on exemption or causation grounds. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Integris Health (10th Cir.) — state-law privacy claims over third-party data sharing (Google/Facebook) left unresolved/remanded, closely mirroring TikTok's data-sharing exposure. Main risk: Dismissal on statutory/technical grounds (e.g., Nuance's GLBA exemption, Tower Health's pixel-claim dismissal) if TikTok shows consent/exemption defenses Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $150M–$750M Raw class-size x per-member multiplication overstates true settlement value; actual payouts historically capped near $725M due to claims-rate and opt-in limits. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | C.D. Cal. | 2026-10-08 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |