E.D.N.Y · No. 1:26-cv-06514
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Development, Inc.source ↗ filed by Shaked Law Group, P.C. · No. 1:26-cv-06514 · 42:1201 Civil Rights (Disability) · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$780K ▾Comparable ADA rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir., same circuit as E.D.N.Y.) affirmed dismissal because plaintiffs failed to prove modification efficacy, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations and Price v. Diab upheld an ADA default/injunction. Accessibility claims survive more often when physical/structural barriers are well-pled, but evidentiary burden is real. Comparable settlements $65K–$780K median $365K · n=4 The Container Stor $780K · Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) — controlling circuit precedent placing burden on plaintiff to prove reasonableness/effectiveness of requested accessibility fix, directly relevant to E.D.N.Y. venue. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to show proposed accommodation is reasonable/effective, as in Lowell v. Lyft, especially if claim rests on facility-specific modification demands. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1K–$100K Web signals do not identify the actual defendant (name collides with unrelated MSC entities); class size, facts, and claim scope are unverified, making this a low-confidence directional estimate only. · grounded in 8 rulings, 4 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | E.D.N.Y | 2026-10-08 | $65K–$780K comparable settlements |