Robb v. Bounce AI, Inc.

D. Nev. · No. 3:26-cv-00786

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

Matter	Type	Practice area	Court	Date	Value
Bounce AI, Inc.source ↗ filed by Kazerouni Law Group, APC · Judge Miranda Mai Du · No. 3:26-cv-00786 · 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M ▾ FCRA comparables split: Minano v. DLJ dismissed several FCRA furnisher claims for no private right of action, while Askins v. CRST let a disclosure-violation claim survive on bare statutory injury grounds. No direct FDCPA ruling closely matches Bounce AI's debt-resolution fintech model. Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M median $5.85M · n=10 Equifax $100M · Equifax Informatio $30M · Equifax $30M Per member (realized): ~$250 median · $25–$500 (n=5) Comparable verdict: TransUnion $60M · TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital — shows courts readily dismiss FCRA furnisher claims lacking private right of action or factual specificity, a likely early motion risk here. Main risk: Dismissal of core FCRA counts for lack of private right of action or insufficient pleading, as in Minano v. DLJ Mortgage This defendant: Second known filing (Johnson v. Bounce AI) suggests emerging litigation pattern against this fintech debt-resolution platform. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $100K–$9M Small, heterogeneous comparable set mixing FCRA/FDCPA theories across unrelated fact patterns; true class size and certification posture unknown. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts	Filing	Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA)	D. Nev.	2026-10-08	$2.40M–$100M comparable settlements