W.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-02201
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUMENS, INC.source ↗ filed by East End Trial Group LLC · No. 2:26-cv-02201 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA accessibility rulings are split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal because plaintiffs failed to prove reasonable modifications, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment. Outcomes turn heavily on specificity of alleged barriers and remediation feasibility. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) - shows courts require plaintiffs to prove proposed accommodations are effective, a common failure point in ADA accessibility suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, provable barrier or reasonable modification, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $20K–$250K Web signals conflate Lumen Technologies (telecom) with Lumens Inc.; class size and defendant scale are highly uncertain. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | W.D. Pa. | 2026-10-08 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |