S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08888
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bangkit (U.S.A.), Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08888 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Comparable ADA rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) affirmed dismissal where plaintiffs failed to prove reasonableness of proposed modification, while Holmes v. Bax (8th Cir.) affirmed ADA violations findings. Outcome likely turns on specificity of alleged barrier and remediation feasibility. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) — same circuit as S.D.N.Y., shows plaintiffs bear burden on reasonableness/effectiveness of accommodation, a common failure point. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, remediable barrier or standing, as in Lowell v. Lyft affirmance Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$25K Small sample size, no prior defendant history, and ADA Title III typically yields injunctive relief/fees rather than per-member monetary damages, limiting EV precision. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-10-08 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |