C.D. Cal. · No. 2:26-cv-11724
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F W Mingli, Incsource ↗ filed by Open Access Law, APC · Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff · No. 2:26-cv-11724 · 42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Price v. Diab shows default/injunctive ADA claims readily succeed and support fee awards, while Lowell v. Lyft shows dismissal affirmed where plaintiff can't prove modification effectiveness. Small-business defendant and C.D. Cal. venue suggest a typical single-plaintiff 'drive-by' accessibility suit with Unruh Act tag-along. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) - confirms ADA plaintiffs who secure injunctive relief are prevailing parties entitled to fees, raising settlement leverage even without damages Main risk: Dismissal for lack of standing/mootness if defendant remediates access barrier before judgment, per common ADA Title III pattern Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$6K No prior defendant records, no direct comparable settlements at this defendant's scale; estimate relies on statutory anchors, not realized payouts. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | C.D. Cal. | 2026-10-07 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |