C.D. Cal. · No. 2:26-cv-11716
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rw2, LLCsource ↗ filed by Open Access Law, APC · Judge A. Joel Richlin · No. 2:26-cv-11716 · 42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA accessibility claims show split outcomes: Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations while Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove effective modification. Price v. Diab shows default/injunctive relief can succeed but fee-shifting outcomes are unpredictable. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — shows courts require plaintiffs to prove proposed accommodations are reasonable/effective, a common failure point. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a plausible, effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $20K–$250K No defendant-specific facts (business type, locations) could be confirmed from web signals; estimates rely on generic ADA/Unruh patterns. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | C.D. Cal. | 2026-10-07 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |