N.D. Ill. · No. 1:26-cv-12335
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpaceXAI LLCsource ↗ filed by Justice Jagher London & Millen LLC · Judge Sara Lee Ellis · No. 1:26-cv-12335 · 28:1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Privacy/wiretap claims show split outcomes: Bayhealth and Clements v. Gunnar survived or were revived on appeal, while Tower Health, Nuance, and Walker were dismissed on similar data-collection theories. Outcome often hinges on fact-specific statutory exclusions (e.g., BIPA healthcare/financial exemptions) not yet resolved here. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Clements v. Gunnar Optiks (7th Cir.) — shows wiretap/biometric claims against AI-adjacent tech can survive 12(b)(6) when exclusion defenses require factual development. Main risk: Dismissal on statutory exemption or standing grounds, as in Nuance (GLBA exemption) and Tower Health (pixel-sharing claim dismissed). Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2.70M–$10.10M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; class size inferred from early-stage product metrics, not certified class data; outcome highly fact-dependent on data-collection mechanics. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | N.D. Ill. | 2026-10-07 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |