W.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-02196
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REP FITNESS LLCsource ↗ filed by East End Trial Group LLC · No. 2:26-cv-02196 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Precedent is split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal because plaintiffs failed to prove reasonable-modification effectiveness, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA liability findings; outcomes turn heavily on specific accessibility facts not yet known here. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — shows courts require plaintiffs to prove proposed accessibility fix is effective, a common defense hurdle in ADA website/product cases. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to show concrete, provable barrier or effective remedy, as in Lowell v. Lyft Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $50K–$300K No defendant-specific precedent; small sample of unrelated ADA rulings and settlements limits precision; actual claim type (website vs. physical access) unknown. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | W.D. Pa. | 2026-10-07 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |