W.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-02195
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BONGO, LLCsource ↗ filed by East End Trial Group LLC · No. 2:26-cv-02195 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA Title III accessibility claims split on outcome: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal where plaintiffs couldn't prove effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment. Title III offers no damages, so value hinges on injunctive relief and fee-shifting per Price v. Diab. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — shows plaintiffs bear burden to prove reasonable/effective accommodation, a common dismissal vector for digital accessibility claims like Bongo's. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a viable, effective accommodation/modification, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $20K–$300K No defendant-specific litigation history or confirmed class mechanism; estimate blends thin settlement data with general ADA Title III fee-driven dynamics, not per-member statutory damages. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | W.D. Pa. | 2026-10-07 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |