E.D. Pa. · No. 5:26-cv-07703
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLCsource ↗ filed by Glanzberg Tobia Law, P.C. · Judge Joseph F. Leeson Jr. · No. 5:26-cv-07703 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M ▾Minano v. DLJ Mortgage shows FCRA furnisher claims often dismissed for lack of private right of action or insufficient pleading, while Askins v. CRST shows disclosure-based FCRA claims can survive dismissal. Equifax's litigation history shows frequent individual FCRA suits with mixed outcomes and one modest settlement. Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M median $7.86M · n=10 Equifax $100M · Equifax $30M · Equifax Informatio $30M Per member (realized): ~$250 median · $25–$500 (n=5) Comparable verdict: TransUnion $60M · TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital — most relevant since it dismisses several FCRA theories (1681i, 1681c-2, 1681s-2) that commonly appear against CRAs/furnishers like Equifax. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a cognizable FCRA theory or lack of private right of action, as in Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital. This defendant: Equifax faces recurring individual FCRA suits (Harris x2, Porter, Ali, McClary) plus a prior $2.2M Bradberry settlement, showing steady but modest-dollar litigation pattern. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): – Sample is small and largely class-settlement data; this case appears individual, so statutory per-plaintiff damages, not class payouts, likely govern outcome. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-10-07 | $2.40M–$100M comparable settlements |