← Records

Amy Trinh v. Uniqlo USA LLC

S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08829

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
Uniqlo USA LLCsource ↗
filed by Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC · Judge Ronnie Abrams · No. 1:26-cv-08829 · 28:1332fr Diversity-Fraud · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $200M–$688M ▾
No directly on-point false-advertising apparel rulings in the comparable set; Citizens of Humanity shows 'Made in USA'-style claims can proceed but face heavy scrutiny, while Guthrie shows certification often fails on individualized reliance issues.
Comparable settlements $200M–$688M median $237.50M · n=10
Merck & Co. Inc. a $688M · Toyota Industries $436M · Toyota Industries $299.50M
Per member (realized): ~$2,500 median · $2,500–$2,500 (n=1)
Comparable verdict: Papaya $420M · VPX, Inc. $293M
Key precedent: Citizens of Humanity v. Donboli — nearest analog (apparel labeling claim), shows courts scrutinize probable cause/merit of such suits closely.
Main risk: Class certification denial due to individualized reliance/communication issues, as in Guthrie v. Transamerica.
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $250K–$50M
Comparable set lacks true apparel/false-advertising precedent; settlement and per-member benchmarks drawn from unrelated large-scale cases, so figures are rough and low-confidence. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 9 verdicts
FilingFalse AdvertisingS.D.N.Y.2026-10-06$200M–$688M
comparable settlements