D. Or. · No. 3:26-cv-02076
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Companysource ↗ filed by Foreman Sturm & Thede LLP · Judge Karin Immergut · No. 3:26-cv-02076 · 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparable rulings split roughly evenly: tracking-tech privacy claims survived in Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks but were dismissed in Tower Health and Nuance, showing courts scrutinize consent/exemption facts closely. Allstate's wiretap exposure likely hinges on similar fact-specific consent analysis under Oregon's wiretap statute. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — survived because defendant owed a confidentiality-type duty via tracking tech, a close analog to insurer data-sharing claims. Main risk: Dismissal on consent/exemption grounds as in Tower Health and Nuance, where tracking or data-sharing fell within statutory or contractual exceptions. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $750K–$52.50M Small, heterogeneous comparable set mixes BIPA, health-pixel, and fraud cases; true Oregon wiretap class size and per-member recovery remain speculative. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D. Or. | 2026-10-06 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |