W.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-02181
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUDGET BLINDS, LLCsource ↗ filed by East End Trial Group LLC · No. 2:26-cv-02181 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$780K ▾Comparable ADA rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal where plaintiff failed to prove effectiveness of accommodation, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA claims surviving summary judgment. No defendant-specific history exists to tilt the read either way. Comparable settlements $65K–$780K median $365K · n=4 The Container Stor $780K · Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - dismissal affirmed because plaintiff bore burden to show proposed accessibility modification was effective, a common failure point in ADA accommodation suits. Main risk: Failure to plead a specific, effective accommodation (as in Lowell) or mootness if defendant voluntarily remediates before certification (as in Burton v. Chase Point). Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$750K Small, heterogeneous comparable set; no prior Budget Blinds litigation data; true class size and per-member recovery highly uncertain. · grounded in 8 rulings, 4 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | W.D. Pa. | 2026-10-06 | $65K–$780K comparable settlements |