M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-03035
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOODFELLOWS OF PASCO COUNTY, INC. d/b/a BRASS FLAMINGOsource ↗ filed by The Leach Firm · No. 8:26-cv-03035 · 29:215 FLSA: Prohibited Acts · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Wiretap/tracking-tech claims show split outcomes: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived pleading-stage challenges, while Tower Health and Nuance were dismissed on exemption/standing grounds. A small single-location defendant like Brass Flamingo lacks the scale/data infrastructure seen in these comparables, making outcome prediction harder. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — survived MTD on confidentiality/tracking-tech theory, showing such claims can clear pleading stage even against smaller, non-tech defendants. Main risk: Dismissal on statutory exemption or lack of 'interception' under wiretap laws, mirroring Tower Health and Nuance outcomes. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$72K Comparables are dominated by mega-tech settlements/verdicts poorly matched to a small local business defendant; true EV likely far lower and highly uncertain given no prior record and thin web signals on class size. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-10-06 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |