STRATFORD v. COMPU-LINK CORP.

E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-07683

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

Matter	Type	Practice area	Court	Date	Value
COMPU-LINK CORP.source ↗ filed by Community Legal Services · Judge Nitza I. Quinones Alejandro · No. 2:26-cv-07683 · 28:2409(a) Quiet Title Action · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾ Comparable privacy/tracking-tech rulings split: Doe v. Bayhealth allowed a confidentiality claim to survive while Santoro v. Tower Health and Integris Health show courts dismissing or remanding similar Meta Pixel/tracking claims on pleading or procedural grounds. Compu-Link's smaller healthcare-software footprint makes outcome fact-dependent on data-sharing specifics. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — healthcare provider duty-of-confidentiality claim survived MTD, closest factual analog for a health-adjacent tech vendor like Compu-Link. Main risk: Dismissal like Santoro v. Tower Health, where similar tracking-tech privacy claims were dismissed with prejudice for pleading deficiencies. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $300K–$8.70M Small comparable sample (n=2 for per-member data) and no prior Compu-Link litigation history; class size is inferred from limited web signals, not confirmed user/patient counts. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts	Filing	Privacy & Wiretap	E.D. Pa.	2026-10-06	$59.50M–$725M comparable settlements