M.D. Tenn. · No. 3:26-cv-01425
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bhuvaneshwari Group, Inc.source ↗ filed by Provost Umphrey Law Firm, LLP · Judge Waverly David Crenshaw Jr. · No. 3:26-cv-01425 · 28:1391 Personal Injury · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparable rulings split on viability: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived pleading-stage challenges on tracking/biometric privacy theories, while Tower Health and Nuance were dismissed on similar Pixel/biometric claims. Defendant is a small, apparently non-tech Indian conglomerate, making large-tech settlement comparables poorly fitted. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. - shows confidentiality/tracking claims can survive MTD when a duty-like relationship or data-sharing is pled, relevant if plaintiff alleges similar tracking tech use. Main risk: Dismissal on exemption/standing grounds similar to Nuance (GLBA-type carve-out) or Tower Health (pleading deficiencies), especially given defendant's non-tech business model. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$1.45M Defendant appears to be a diversified Indian conglomerate, not a US tech/data company; comparables are mismatched in scale, so estimates are highly speculative. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Tenn. | 2026-10-06 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |