E.D. Wis. · No. 2:26-cv-01857
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blinds To Go US Incsource ↗ filed by Equal Access Law Group PLLC · Judge Pamela Pepper · No. 2:26-cv-01857 · 42:2000 American Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$780K ▾ADA accessibility claims split in comparables: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to show reasonable modification, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations but vacated injunctive relief. Outcome likely hinges on specificity of alleged access barrier and remedy sought. Comparable settlements $65K–$780K median $365K · n=4 The Container Stor $780K · Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - shows plaintiffs bear burden proving proposed accommodation is effective, a common failure point in ADA accessibility suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$25K Small, heterogeneous comparable set; no defendant history; settlement data reflects larger multi-claimant cases not directly comparable to single-plaintiff ADA suit. · grounded in 8 rulings, 4 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | E.D. Wis. | 2026-10-06 | $65K–$780K comparable settlements |