S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-26987
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REVOLVE GROUP, INC.source ↗ filed by Adams & Associates, P.A. · No. 1:26-cv-26987 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Comparables split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal because plaintiffs failed to prove reasonable modification, while Holmes v. Bax and Price v. Diab affirmed ADA liability/relief. Outcome turns heavily on pleading specificity of the barrier/remedy, typical in S.D. Fla. website-access suits. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — shows courts dismiss ADA claims absent concrete proof a requested accommodation/fix is effective, a common defense for e-commerce defendants like Revolve. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft, or mootness if Revolve remediates site before ruling (cf. Burton v. Chase Point). Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$16K Small, heterogeneous sample mixing accessibility sub-theories (physical vs. digital) and no Revolve-specific or S.D. Fla. ADA website data; estimate is directional only. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-10-06 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |