S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08801
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacques Marie Mage, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08801 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA accessibility claims show split outcomes: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal where plaintiffs failed to prove modification effectiveness, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations and Price v. Diab favored plaintiffs on fee-shifting after default. No controlling precedent on retail website accessibility specifically. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) is most relevant — it shows SDNY/2d Cir. plaintiffs bear burden of proving proposed accessibility fixes are reasonable and effective, a frequent failure point. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to show concrete, effective remedial modifications or lack of standing/imminent injury, as in Lowell v. Lyft Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$12K Small, heterogeneous comparable set mixing Title III, employment, and benefits ADA claims; true class size and settlement value highly speculative absent complaint details. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-10-06 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |