C.D. Cal. · No. 2:26-cv-11557
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fata Morgana Again LLCsource ↗ filed by So Cal Equal Access Group · Judge Margo A. Rocconi · No. 2:26-cv-11557 · 42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA accessibility claims show mixed outcomes: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal where plaintiff failed to prove modification effectiveness, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations and Price v. Diab upheld injunctive relief/fees for prevailing plaintiffs. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - shows plaintiffs bear burden proving reasonable accommodation, a common dismissal ground in ADA access suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a plausible, effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$100K Web signals are largely irrelevant (confused with unrelated video-game/company entities); class size and defendant scale highly uncertain. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | C.D. Cal. | 2026-10-05 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |