W.D. Wash. · No. 2:26-cv-03737
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pacific Virginia LLCsource ↗ filed by BYRNES KELLER CROMWELL LLP · No. 2:26-cv-03737 · 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Comparable ADA rulings split: Holmes affirmed ADA claims while Lowell v. Lyft and Billesdon affirmed dismissal/reversal of ADA theories, showing inconsistent outcomes depending on facts and remedy sought. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — dismissal affirmed because plaintiffs failed to prove proposed accommodation was effective, a common failure point in ADA accessibility suits. Main risk: Plaintiff fails to show proposed modification is reasonable/effective, as in Lowell v. Lyft, leading to dismissal. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $20K–$750K Web signals do not clearly identify defendant's business/industry, limiting class-size and risk precision; sample of rulings is small and mixed. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | W.D. Wash. | 2026-10-02 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |