M.D. Fla. · No. 6:26-cv-02299
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thai House of Orlando, Inc.source ↗ filed by Sconzo Law Office, P.A. · No. 6:26-cv-02299 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA Title III accessibility suits against small single-location businesses typically survive motions to dismiss when barriers are specifically pled, similar to Price v. Diab where default/injunctive relief was upheld; but Lowell v. Lyft shows reasonableness/burden issues can defeat claims if remediation specifics are weak. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — shows ADA accessibility claims readily yield injunctive relief and fee awards even on default, the typical posture for small-business ADA suits. Main risk: Settlement comps are mismatched (big HOAs/retailers); actual exposure for a small restaurant is likely far lower, driven mainly by attorney's fees, not damages. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $4K–$18K Settlement comps are from much larger defendants and don't reflect single-location restaurant exposure; EV here is fee/injunctive-driven, not damages-driven. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-10-02 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |