M.D. Fla. · No. 6:26-cv-02298
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culver Franchising System, LLCsource ↗ filed by Sconzo Law Office, P.A. · No. 6:26-cv-02298 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Comparable ADA rulings split: Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations while Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove reasonable modification was effective. Outcomes turn heavily on specific factual showing of barrier/remedy. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — shows courts require concrete proof modification is effective, a common failure point for ADA accessibility pleadings. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, provably effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $25K–$165K Small, heterogeneous comparable set; no damages class typical under Title III, so EV reflects single-plaintiff settlement/fee exposure, not per-capita class damages. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-10-02 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |