E.D.N.Y · No. 1:26-cv-06297
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barclays Bank Delawaresource ↗ filed by Stein Saks, PLLC · No. 1:26-cv-06297 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M ▾Minano v. DLJ Mortgage shows most FCRA furnisher claims (no private right of action) get dismissed, a direct risk for Barclays as a furnisher; but Askins shows disclosure-based claims can survive on standing. Single-plaintiff FCRA/FDCPA suits against bank furnishers are frequently narrowed at MTD stage. Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M median $5.85M · n=10 Equifax $100M · Equifax Informatio $30M · Equifax $30M Per member (realized): ~$250 median · $25–$500 (n=5) Comparable verdict: TransUnion $60M · TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital - most factually analogous; dismissed FCRA furnisher claims (§§1681i(a)(5), c-2, s-2(a)(8)) for no private right of action, leaving only narrower claims to proceed. Main risk: Dismissal of core FCRA furnisher claims for lack of private right of action, as in Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital. This defendant: Prior Woodward v. Barclays Bank Delaware filing on same FCRA/FDCPA theory suggests recurring furnisher-dispute litigation pattern. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$500K Small sample, no confirmed class certification, and case appears individual rather than class-wide; estimates are highly speculative. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D.N.Y | 2026-10-02 | $2.40M–$100M comparable settlements |