M.D. Fla. · No. 6:26-cv-02295
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honorato & Sons, Corp.source ↗ filed by Sconzo Law Office, P.A. · No. 6:26-cv-02295 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA accessibility outcomes split: Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations for plaintiffs, while Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal because plaintiff failed to prove effectiveness of modification. Small defendant with no accessibility litigation history adds uncertainty to outcome prediction. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — shows courts will dismiss if plaintiff can't prove requested modification is reasonable/effective, a common defense in ADA Title III suits. Main risk: Dismissal risk per Lowell v. Lyft if plaintiff's proposed accommodation isn't shown to be reasonable/effective at pleading stage. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$120K Small sample, no defendant-specific litigation history, and settlement comps involve much larger entities than this defendant, limiting precision. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-10-02 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |