M.D.N.C. · No. 1:26-cv-01161
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLCsource ↗ filed by NARDONE LAW, PLLC · No. 1:26-cv-01161 · 11:101 Bankruptcy · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Privacy/wiretap-adjacent claims show split outcomes: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived pleading challenges, while Santoro v. Tower Health and Cisneros v. Nuance were dismissed on statutory exemption/pleading grounds. No direct Nationstar or mortgage-servicer wiretap precedent exists in the sample. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Santoro v. Tower Health - dismissed similar covert-tracking privacy claim for pleading failure, showing courts scrutinize interception/consent elements closely. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead actionable interception or lack of consent, as in Cisneros (statutory exemption) and Santoro (pleading deficiency). This defendant: Prior FCRA/FDCPA filing (Arnold v. Nationstar) suggests recurring consumer-protection litigation exposure. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $900K–$27M Small, heterogeneous comparable set mixes health-privacy and biometric cases; true wiretap/mortgage-servicer analogs are scarce, limiting precision. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D.N.C. | 2026-10-02 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |